And you just have to laugh at how completely, hilariously bad it is.
Why is it appropriate to make the history of half the human race into a subject in its own right?
It is anticipated that one's opinion of its [women's history's] value will be predetermined by one's sex – something that most of us can do even less to change than our class-conditioned prejudices.
[H]istorical writing has hitherto been monopolised by the other half, is this not because the pace of events in nearly all known human societies has been set by men?
I'm sure there are plenty of recent reviews with similar issues. I would love to hateread them.