...so is everyone just going with "they were having sex in the car after all" now because TMZ published some grainy photos that don't show what the witness claimed? With some patented scumbaggy TMZ commentary for good measure, of course.

For instance, the photos do NOT show her with her shirt up.

I feel like I'm taking crazy pills. Most sources are now taking the POV that she lied. Where is the evidence of that? It looks like they were heavily making out as she straddled him, fully clothed. Maybe the photos just didn't capture it, but really? Why is "she's been caught in a lie" the new narrative, even among some of those who initially supported her?

This is aggravating me. Also, the audio does NOTHING to vindicate the cop. At all. It shows he doesn't know the law or just doesn't care.

What am I missing here?